Top Property and Casualty Insurance Companies

The property & casualty insurance industry today faces a lot of challenges including market pressures, technology, rising claim cost, expense management, legislation, compliance and more. The top property and casualty insurance companies have to take these challenges in stride. They often do things with a different approach to set themselves apart from the competition.

These top performing companies in particular maintain efficient operating models; they meet the needs of their clients and successfully execute their business strategy. There are some benchmark practices that set apart the top performing companies from the rest of the industry.

Operational Efficiency

Today companies must manage significant changes in workloads and workflows in all areas of their organization as a result of technological advances and changing market conditions. The top property & casualty insurance companies have about 19% fewer employees when measured against premiums written. Also web-based technology, enterprise content management, predictive modeling have significantly impacted on operating models.

The ability to switch to new technology has provided significant savings in expense and a more efficient workforce. For instance, imaging and automated workflow has provided the companies the opportunity to centralize the back office operations while still keeping the customer-facing activities in the field. They have also succeeded in maintaining a staff to management ratio of 6.8 to 1, in comparison to 5.3 to 1, on the average. This difference in staff to management equals a savings of nearly $2,200 per employee, on the average.

Customer Focus

Most often, when companies begin to experience increasing demands from their clients, it is easy for them to get lost in the myriad of request and possibly lose focus on the customers. Customer services have gone beyond just servicing the policy holders. Insurance firms know that they have a lot of customers to support both internal and external.

The top companies consciously service all the customers, including the policy holders, employees, agents and outside service partners. Because they believe with superior customer service and ease of doing business, customer loyalty and retention will be improved significantly.

Strategic Execution

Companies that want to remain competitive must clearly understand their core competencies with which to develop and execute their corporate strategy. The top property & casualty insurance companies always achieve superior results through the combination of effective distribution channels, product focus, technology and strong market knowledge within their target areas. Every company that has been able to quickly capitalize on these strengths will always have a tremendous competitive edge.

Based on the above benchmarks, some top performing property and casualty insurance companies are as follows:

  • Accident Fund
  • Acuity
  • Amerisure Companies
  • ANPAC
  • California State Automobile Association
  • Canal Insurance Group
  • Chubb Group
  • GEICO
  • Germania Insurance Group
  • Grange Mutual Casualty Group

When you need the services of a top property and casualty insurance firm, always make sure that they satisfy these fundamental benchmarks, and by so doing you will be guaranteed a great service. The insurance industry and their services are even more needed in the 21st century than ever because our society today is plagued with so many dangers and uncertainties, hence the increasing need for insurance.

Auto Insurance Company – Free Online Car Insurance Company

Today it is very easy to find an auto insurance company free online car insurance quote. In fact, just about every company today offers these quotes online, in order to help you to find out whether not their the right company for you. So what is the best company for you? If it was this easy to determine this, everybody would go the same company.

The truth is, the best car insurance company will vary from person to person, depending on their personal situation. For instance, some companies might offer discounts for good driving records, even good grades, etc. It all depends on you and your situation. One company might be cheaper for your neighbor and may actually be more expensive for you.

So what are some for things to look for an auto insurance company? First of all, this is an obvious one, but it still is one of the central points: the price. The price of a policy will go a long ways to determining which is the right company for you is.

Of course, price certainly isn’t the only factor. Customer service is extremely important as well.

Quite simply, the insurance company industry, for better or worse, has developed the reputation of poor customer service. Many people report nightmare experience of having to wait hours before they get to talk with a representative.

Therefore, always make sure that the customer service is good before going with a particular company. Quite simply, some companies don’t have nearly the amount of current experience the other companies do. Therefore, it is imperative to look at the experience factor when deciding the right insurance company for you.

So how do you find out this information? Again, as with just about any information you want to find out in today’s world, the Internet has an abundance of info; by simply doing a quick Google search you will find literally millions of results to help you find out the right auto insurance company for you. Hopefully is important information help you quickly and easily find the right car insurance company for you with your individual situation.

Insurance Companies and Universal Health Care

Insurance companies serve a very important function in our society. The purpose of insurance is to share risk. Risk is the amount of economic loss that someone is willing to assume in an activity. For instance, a bank would not loan money for the purpose of buying a house, unless the house was protected against losses such as fire, wind and other perils. That protection is provided by a Homeowner’s policy.

A loan to purchase an automobile would not be available unless the car was insured for losses by theft or collision. That protection is provided by an auto policy.

Health insurance is a policy that shares the risk of losses caused by injuries or illness. A share of the risk is assumed by the individual through a deductible or co-pay. In-other-words, if someone visits the doctor, that individual may be required to pay the first $15 or $20 of the visit. The health insurance company assumes the risk of the remainder of the cost.

That shared risk comes about through an exchange of ‘consideration’. Consideration is value. The insured pays a premium in exchange for the promise of the insurance company to pay certain costs associated with the insured’s health care. Which brings us to the controversy surrounding the government’s efforts to institute what some call universal health care.

No matter what side of the argument you are on, in favor or against universal health care, one issue has been settled. President Obama stated publicly that it is impossible to insure the ‘uninsured’ without additional costs. So, the idea that this will be a ‘deficit neutral’ policy has been debunked by the administration itself. Either taxes go up to pay for the program, or health care will have to be rationed to keep costs neutral, or bring them down.

In response to the public out-cry about a government health care program, the administration has called the insurance companies villains. After all, insurance companies exclude preexisting conditions for some period of time when an individual enrolls (however that is not always the case with group policies), and insurance companies are making a ‘profit’.

PreExsiting Conditions

Think about the concept of risk and preexisting conditions. An individual has a home that has been damaged by fire. Would a homeowner’s insurance company now write a policy that would cover the repairs to home caused by the preexisting fire? Of course not! That is not shared risk, that is bad business.

An individual has a preexisting health condition, say diabetes. Purchasing a policy that would exclude the treatment for diabetes for a limited period of time (usually two years), now results in a shared risk. The health insurance company will cover the person for other perils, and if that individual pays the premiums over time, that exclusion regarding the preexisting condition is then dropped.

Is it possible for the government to insure everyone in the United States and force insurance companies to provide policies without regard to preexisting conditions? It is possible, but not without driving the cost of health-care way up. After all, the money to pay the doctors and hospitals have to come from somewhere and President Obama stated that ‘We are out of money’. Since the government doesn’t earn money, its only source of revenue is taxes.

Profit

Insurance companies are being cast as the bad guy since companies make a profit. Which do you prefer, companies that are well run that make a profit, or a company like General Motors that required billions of dollars of taxpayer money to bail the company out? A profit is what allows companies to expand services and provide jobs. Companies that fail to make a profit, go out-of-business.

The government not only fails to make a profit, as a well run business entity should, it runs at a deficit. The latest example is Cash for Clunkers. Not only was taxpayer money used to subsidize auto sales, now car dealers are complaining that the government is not sending the checks for the Clunkers that were promised. It appears that many buyers will have lost their old cars and now face repossession of the new cars purchased since the money for the program did not actually exist.

This does not bode well for a government run health care system.

Tort Reform

Doctors and hospitals must practice defensive medicine. People will sue for anything. Tort lawyers use a ‘shot-gun’ approach when filing a malpractice lawsuit. All doctors, nurses, technicians and hospitals involved in a case are named as a defendant, whether that party had any actual responsibility for the claimed injury and damage.

We need a loser pay system, which provides that anyone who brings a lawsuit and loses, is required to pay the other side’s attorney fees and expenses. That would do away with most frivolous lawsuits and bring the costs of health care down.

Big Government Solution

Government should be required to live within its means. It does not, and the government, not insurance companies, is the villain in this scenario.

The founding fathers did not foresee a large, powerful centralized government. That is what was the war of independence against England was all about. The US Constitution delegated specific powers to the Federal Government, and it does not specify taking over any private sector industry.

Medicare and Medicaid are government health care programs on the verge of collapse. Even President Obama admits Medicare cannot be sustained. No program can be sustained when it runs at a deficit and all government programs run at a deficit.

Universal Health Care will run at a deficit from day one and that is just bad business.